According to BitMEX Research, the COPA (Crypto Open Patent Alliance) case against Craig Wright has now been announced. In the verdict, Craig Wright is far less clever than he thinks he is. In his written testimony and in days of oral testimony during cross-examination, it is completely clear that Wright lied extensively and repeatedly to the court. Most of his lies were related to documents he forged that were intended to support his claims. All of his lies and forged documents were intended to support his biggest lie: his claim that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. The real situation is much simpler. However, because Wright has lied so many times over the years, in some ways it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what actually happened. These difficulties do not affect the fact that Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. In terms of the evidence that allegedly supports his claims, it is at best questionable or very doubtful, or completely circumstantial, and at worst, it is fabricated and/or based on documents that are believed to be massive forgeries by Wright. These fabrications and forgeries were revealed in the evidence received at trial. As such, this judgment contains a wealth of technical and other details intended to reveal the true scale of his false claims to prove that he is/was Satoshi Nakamoto. These details were laid out in the detailed written closing arguments prepared by COPA and the developers, and further emphasized in their oral closing arguments.

According to U.Today, a recent debate has been sparked by Ripple's Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David Schwartz, over the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of Bitcoin. The controversy began when a well-known Bitcoin community member, who goes by the alias 'Ryuushi', proposed that despite recent legal challenges, Craig Wright remains the most likely candidate to be Nakamoto. Schwartz, however, dismissed this claim as 'complete nonsense', pointing out Wright's inability to provide definitive proof of his identity as Nakamoto during the trial. He also noted that other individuals, including himself, had no reason to falsely claim to be the author of Bitcoin. Schwartz's rebuttal has reignited speculation about his own possible connection to Nakamoto. Some theorists, citing his extensive background in cryptography dating back to the early days of the field, have suggested him as a potential candidate for Nakamoto's identity. His involvement in pioneering patents related to distributed ledger technology has further fueled this speculation. Despite these theories, Schwartz has consistently denied any association with Nakamoto, asserting that he is solely an architect of XRP Ledger, separate from Bitcoin's genesis. The debate over Wright's claims to the title of Bitcoin's creator continues. Despite Wright's legal struggles, the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) recently achieved a victory when a judge ruled against Wright's claim that he is Nakamoto. COPA, an organization committed to protecting the open-source nature of cryptocurrencies, is seeking further injunctions to prevent Wright from making additional claims and pursuing litigation in the crypto community.

Australian computer scientist Craig Wright has stopped appealing a defamation case he lost in Norway in 2022 over his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of Bitcoin. The appeal was against Magnus Granath, a Norwegian citizen who tweeted fiery rhetoric against Wright. In 2022, a Norwegian judge sided with Granath on wording choices and other written statements, and Wright sought to appeal the decision. Granath announced on social media: "Just got off the phone with my Norwegian lawyer and my 2022 win is now final and enforceable. This case started on May 19, 2019 and lasts until today. I'm very happy! Now I just need to get the UK case dismissed/win and I can move on." Wright filed a defamation lawsuit against Granath in Norway in May 2019, alleging written and defamatory comments intended to damage someone's reputation. (The Block)

Craig Wright has made new allegations against several members of the cryptocurrency community during a trial in the UK High Court. At the same time, he himself was accused of giving inconsistent statements in court. The case involves a lawsuit in which he claims to have invented Bitcoin, and his cross-examination is still ongoing. The Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA) is a non-profit organization backed by cryptocurrency players such as Coinbase, Microstrategy and Twitter founder Jack Dorsey. The group sued Craig Wright in 2021, accusing him of committing "massive forgery" while trying to prove he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Jonathan Hough of COPA's law firm Bird & Bird LLP asked Craig Wright to stop making "frivolous accusations" and "answer questions." Craig Wright just accused COPA members of turning Bitcoin into a “speculative coin” scam. When Craig Wright protested, presiding judge James Mellor intervened, saying that arguments about the current state of the Bitcoin system were not helpful in his decision and that the case focused on whether Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous author of the Bitcoin white paper. (CoinDesk)

The legal battle over the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin rights has taken a new turn in recent days, with a British judge rescheduling the trial between Craig Wright and Bitcoin Core developers for February 5 and also approving Bitcoin Core The developer's second application for security ordered Wright to pay an additional £800,000 (approximately $1 million) by January 5 to cover the developer's legal costs if he loses the case. Wright has deposited £100,000 ($127,000) as security deposit. In 2016, Wright sued 13 Bitcoin Core developers and several companies, including Blockstream, Coinbase, and Block, accusing them of infringing upon his copyrights in the Bitcoin white paper, the Bitcoin file format, and the Bitcoin blockchain database. . On December 15, during pretrial review, Judge Edward James Mellor allowed Wright to submit an additional 97 documents to support his claims. The documents, which were allegedly found on two USB drives in a drawer at his home in September, included files from LaTex - the open-source document preparation system used to draft the Bitcoin white paper. Bitcoin developers accused Wright of fabricating evidence, forging and manipulating metadata, and deliberately prolonging the proceedings. According to them, the new documents came to light after they submitted 50 pieces of evidence to prove that Wright's previous submissions were forged. (Cointelegraph)

Odaily Planet Daily News A court document shared by the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund (BLDF), a non-profit organization co-founded by Jack Dorsey, shows that a group of Bitcoin developers are dealing with the self-proclaimed "Bitcoin Creator" Ao Ben Satoshi ( Craig Wright's lawsuit. Wright's Tulip Trading never owned the 111,000 bitcoins it sought to "recover," its lawyers told the U.K. High Court, and that it "forged" documents to prove ownership of the coins and fraudulently gained control of the funds. Right, there is no evidence that Wright or his company ever owned the wallets that held those bitcoins. The "Tulip Trading Limited v. Bitcoin Association" lawsuit originated from a hacking attack in 2020, which resulted in the loss of 111,000 bitcoins claimed by Craig Wright, and then Craig Wright claimed that Bitcoin core developers had a fiduciary responsibility. (CoinDesk)

A U.K. court has granted Craig Wright's appeal in a bitcoin rights lawsuit, allowing him to appeal a lawsuit claiming copyright to the bitcoin white paper and database. Whether Craig Wright is really Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto will be determined in a trial that begins in January 2024.

According to City AM, Craig Wright's case against 16 Bitcoin developers in the UK will be heard in London. Craig Wright previously sued 16 developers, including Roger Ver, known as "Bitcoin Jesus," and Blockstream co-founders Matt Corallo and Greg Maxwell, demanding compensation for $4 billion worth of bitcoins that were lost or hacked. bitcoin. The case was previously dismissed in March 2022.

Wright must pay for court costs, and the court determined there is sufficient evidence for Hodlonaut to debate whether or not Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.